Press Room
March 3, 2002
Brokerage Firms Were Repeatedly Disciplined
Despite Costly Sanctions, They Overlooked Scams
By Teresa Dixon Murray
The Plain Dealer
Cleveland, OH -- Corrections and clarifications:
The following clarification appeared on March
15, 2002: A March 3 story on Page A1 said federal
agents had subpoenaed records from lawyer Dominic
Perry in the investigation of stockbroker Frank
Gruttadauria. Perry's lawyer says no subpoena
was issued to his client. Federal authorities
declined to comment.
The brokerage firms where Frank Gruttadauria
worked can't say they hadn't been warned.
Lehman Brothers Inc. and SG Cowen Corp., which
employed the Gates Mills broker in Cleveland,
both have been repeatedly disciplined by stock-market
regulators to deter lapses and swindles such
as the one Gruttadauria admitted to.
Eleven years ago, Lehman, its Cleveland branch
manager and a Cleveland broker were each indicted
by a Cuyahoga County grand jury on 42 counts
of fraud in a scandal that cost investors millions
of dollars.
Regulators cited the firm for not supervising
a broker who did as he pleased with customer
accounts.
That was nine years before Gruttadauria began
working for Lehman.
Three years ago, regulators fined and chastised
Cowen for several counts of improper trading
and for failing "to establish, maintain
and/or enforce adequate supervisory procedures" in
seven areas, the National Association of Securities
Dealers said.
And the same year, the SEC fined Lehman, Cowen
and 26 other brokerages a total of $27 million
for manipulating the NASDAQ stock market, pocketing
illegal profits and failing to properly supervise
their brokers. Cowen was fined $1.3 million;
Lehman was fined $212,500.
Lehman, in fact, has been sanctioned by regulators
some 220 times in the last quarter-century. In
57 of the cases, Lehman was cited for not properly
supervising brokers. Its file also includes 980
formal customer complaints.
Cowen has been sanctioned at least 37 times in
the last decade; in about a quarter of the cases,
regulators said Cowen wasn't properly supervising
brokers. It has had 30 formal customer complaints.
"How many times do you have to get hit in
the head before you realize it hurts?" asked
Rocky River securities attorney and former broker
Brian Biggins.
Even Gruttadauria admitted astonishment that
he still got away with wholesale fraud for 15
years, and did it right under the noses of the
two firms.
"I can hardly believe I could have done
this without detection for so long," the
44-year-old broker wrote in a note to the FBI
before he vanished in January and spent a month
on the run.
Authorities say Gruttadauria faked spectacular
returns for some clients to lure more investors.
Then, investigators say, he used shell corporations,
forged signatures and outright theft to defraud
them out of roughly $125 million they invested
and some $150 million more that he led them to
believe they had.
He worked for Lehman since October 2000, and
for a decade before that at Cowen.
Gruttadauria so far is charged with "massive
fraud" in a civil suit from the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission and with a criminal charge
of lying to a bank to get a loan. He is in jail
without bond.
Now, six weeks after his scheme came to light,
Gruttadauria's good fortune in a career of misappropriating
others' fortunes is looking even more remarkable,
particularly given the discipline his employers
suffered.
And yet the system failed spectacularly. Indeed,
no one caught Gruttadauria. His antics didn't
come to light until he sent a written confession
to the FBI in January.
Said SEC spokesman John Nester: "It's kind
of like the Enron deal, where the analysts, the
accountants - no one - caught on. Everyone just
missed it."
Among the things they missed:
Gruttadauria's practice of sending phony account-activity
statements to clients and diverting their genuine
statements to keep clients from seeing them.
Authorities say Gruttadauria forged signatures
for more than 50 people on forms authorizing
the brokerage firms to mail statements to post-office
boxes he controlled, and to two of his business
associates, instead of to clients' homes or businesses.
Brokerages shouldn't allow address-switching
so easily, said Lawrence Klayman , a former broker
and NASD employee. He's now a securities lawyer
in Florida who represents both investors and
brokerages.
Firms should confirm a new address with a phone
call or a letter to the client's home address,
Klayman said. And Lehman and Cowen should have
programmed their computers to flag peculiarities,
such as mail for more than 50 clients going to
the same post office box, Klayman said.
Lehman spokesman William Ahearn insisted that
none of the address changes occurred after Lehman
bought Cowen's investor business in October 2000
and brought Gruttadauria into the Lehman fold.
But all of Cowen's clients had to fill out new
account application forms when their accounts
moved from Cowen to Lehman, and yet the misdirected
mailings continued; some now allege that Gruttadauria
must have forged those documents during the transition.
Cowen spokesman Don Nathan said it would be premature
to comment on specifics during the ongoing investigation.
Gruttadauria's own computer, which he kept on
his desk alongside his company-issued computer
but not hooked up to the office network.
Authorities say Gruttadauria used it to keep
his own set of books with false, inflated client
account information. Nearly all brokerages prohibit
personal equipment - even Palm Pilots - unless
they're connected to the company network, so
that co-workers and auditors have access.
Gruttadauria's pattern of steering huge amounts
of money from client accounts to into his accounts
at Cowen and Lehman.
Even though the transfers may have looked legitimate
at a glance (clients now say their signatures
were forged), someone should have noticed, said
David Axelrod, a former federal prosecutor who
recently served as a special prosecutor in Ohio's
largest-ever securities case. The Columbus lawyer
specializes in white-collar crime and money-laundering
cases.
The sheer volume of money transfers into any
single person's account should have been a flag,
Axelrod said. "If you just saw that pattern,
you'd say, what the heck is this?"
Brokerage procedures also normally call for any
account controlled by a broker to be scrutinized
with a fine-tooth comb "because the possibilities
are so rife," said Allan Fedor of Florida,
a 22-year veteran of securities law.
The account balances of dozens of rich customers
in the "high- net-worth" client group
shrinking from tens of millions of dollars to
near zero.
Brokerages are supposed to occasionally conduct
a sort of "customer service check," said
Pat Sadler of Atlanta, president- elect of the
Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association.
"Every legitimate compliance program calls
for the firm to contact the customers at some
point," he said, typically by both phone
and letter for wealthy clients.
Lack of oversight
With questions such as these now being examined,
investor advocates say the two firms' regulatory
records should have pushed them to shape up long
before Gruttadauria. Indeed, last week four Gruttadauria
clients filed two separate suits against Lehman
and Cowen in federal court here, accusing them
of negligent oversight.
The 260 regulatory actions and nearly 1,000 customer
complaints against Lehman in the last 25 years
compare with 64 actions and six complaints in
the last 15 years against Goldman Sachs & Co.,
the brokerage firm closest in size to Lehman.
While Cowen has had fewer sanctions, it too has
been cited repeatedly for sloppy procedures and
supervision, as have all notable investment firms.
Lehman and Cowen almost certainly will be sanctioned
again by regulators in the Gruttadauria case.
Other eyes didn't see
Authorities are also questioning co-workers and
others who perhaps could have realized things
seemed odd in Gruttadauria's brokerage world.
(SEE CLARIFICATION NOTE)Federal agents have subpoenaed
some records from local accountant Joseph DeGrandis
and lawyer Dominic Perry - the two business associates
who were getting legitimate account statements
in the mail from Lehman that were supposed to
be going to Gruttadauria clients.
DeGrandis got statements for 10 to 15 Gruttadauria
clients. DeGrandis' attorney, Ralph Cascarilla,
said about half of the named addressees were
DeGrandis' clients and he did their tax returns.
With the others, Cascarilla said, DeGrandis got
the statements for more than a year because he
hoped to be their accountant someday.
Perry said he received "a couple" of
statements addressed to his clients. Authorities
say one was Andrew Rayburn, a Moreland Hills
businessman who lost roughly $70 million.
Rayburn told investigators he had no idea his
statements were going to Perry and that Perry
wasn't his lawyer - the only legal work Perry
ever did for him was some estate planning years
ago.
DeGrandis and Perry have not been accused of
any violation of criminal or civil law. But some
authorities and former clients wonder if Gruttadauria's
scheme could have fallen apart sooner if those
two had rattled him or his employer with questions
about the misdirected mailings.
In any case, DeGrandis should never have accepted
non clients' statements without objection, said
Clarke Price, spokesman for the Ohio Society
of Certified Public Accountants. "That's
common sense," he said. "To say, 'This
could be a client someday' - that sounds a little
strange. It doesn't even begin to pass the smell
test."
Investor lawsuits and the SEC have also challenged
Lehman's and Cowen's scrutiny from within the
Cleveland office. Like nearly all brokerages,
Cowen and Lehman employed an on-site "compliance
director," whose job is to make sure brokers
follow securities laws. Plaintiffs' lawsuits
contend that job clearly didn't get done.
The Cleveland office's compliance director for
the last decade was Robert Semenak of Euclid.
His boss: Frank Gruttadauria.
Last month, Lehman fired Semenak, along with
co-workers Melinda Trocano and William Kall and
Laurie Kacludis English, Gruttadauria's longtime
assistant and former lover.
Karl May, Semenak's attorney, declined to comment.
'Remain ever vigilant'
All of the misplays in the Gruttadauria case
would be comical if so many people hadn't lost
their life savings, said Tracy Pride Stoneman
of Colorado, a director with the Public Investors
Arbitration Bar Association. She said the Gruttadauria
case should send a strong message to the firms
involved and all investment companies.
Despite the Gruttadauria case and all of its
warts, people should still have confidence in
the regulation of the brokerage industry, said
the SEC's Nester. He said the United States has "the
world's strongest enforcement system."
Dennis Ginty, spokesman for the Ohio Division
of Securities, which oversees brokers in Ohio,
agreed. "But unfortunately, there will be
always will be a new twist to an old plot that
con artists will devise." So regulators
must keep up with the latest shenanigans, and
investors must "remain ever vigilant," he
said.
Brian Ochs, assistant director of enforcement
for the SEC, said the Gruttadauria case is a
fluke.
"There are always going to be people out
there who are waiting to steal your money," Ochs
said. "But I don't think there's any reason
to panic and start putting your money under the
mattress. If cases like the Gruttadauria one
were a common occurrence, it wouldn't have generated
so much interest."