March
31, 2002
Outrage Is Rising as Options Turn to Dust
By Gretchen Morgenson
The New York Times
It was February 1999, and
after 10 years of work in the communications
industry, Kimberly Smith was about
to realize her dream. A single mother
with an infant son, Ms. Smith had amassed
$1.1 million in savings and in stock
options on WorldCom (news/quote) shares
that she had received as an engineering
director. Finally, she had enough to
cash in her chips and stay home with
her child. "I had this dream of
having $1 million in the bank and living
off the interest," she said. "That
seemed really safe."
But when she called the toll-free number
provided by WorldCom for employees
interested in exercising their options,
she recalled, she was told that the
transaction could not be completed
at the time. The representative answering
the phone at Salomon Smith Barney,
the firm hired by WorldCom to administer
its employee stock option plan, said
Ms. Smith could not immediately exercise
the $500,000 worth of WorldCom options
and receive a check for the proceeds.
In fact, she could have done that.
But Ms. Smith said the representative
told her, "It's too many shares
to do."
"She said she had to transfer
me to the investment advisory group," Ms.
Smith recalled.
Which she did.
Ms. Smith, who is now 37, did not know
it at the time, but her dream was about
to become a nightmare. Less than two
years later, she had lost her $1.1
million nest egg. A stock market neophyte,
she said she was pushed by a Salomon
Smith Barney broker in an Atlanta office
to exercise her options, hold her WorldCom
stock and borrow from the firm to pay
for the transactions. When WorldCom
and other technology stocks collapsed
in 2000, she was left with margin loans
and taxes that had destroyed her life
savings.
It may not provide much solace to Ms.
Smith, but she is not alone in her
misfortune. She is one of dozens of
current and former WorldCom employees
who have sued Salomon, a unit of Citigroup
(news/quote), to recover the tens of
millions of dollars in losses incurred
when they followed the advice dispensed
by Salomon brokers in Atlanta.
The New York Stock Exchange has started
an investigation into Salomon Smith
Barney and the activities of its brokers
there who advised WorldCom workers
about their stock options.
Salomon declined to comment in detail
about that investigation or the suits
filed by WorldCom employees, many of
which are now in arbitration. Susan
L. Thomson, a spokeswoman at the firm,
said: "We take all client claims
seriously and review each on its own
merits. Many of these claims rely largely
on the benefit of clear market hindsight.
These employees strongly believed in
the ongoing prospects for their company
and had confidence in the continued
appreciation of their company's stock.
As a result, it was their expressed
desire to keep their WorldCom holdings
intact."
But six current and former WorldCom
employees and lawyers who are handling
the cases of many others dispute that
assessment. They paint a picture of
a brokerage office in Atlanta that
was out of control.
Rather than provide investment advice
to the WorldCom workers based upon
each one's circumstances or appetite
for risk, the dozen or so brokers in
the office seemed to push as many clients
as they could to use the same strategy:
exercise their options, hold onto the
WorldCom shares and borrow from Salomon
to pay the costs of the transactions
and the taxes that were generated.
That not only put the clients at substantial
risk if Worldcom shares declined but
also, because of Salomon's compensation
system, generated big fees to the brokers
who recommended them.
"There was a pattern and an overlay
being applied to all WorldCom employees
regardless of what their situation
was," said Laurence S. Schultz,
a lawyer at Driggers, Schultz & Herbst
in Troy, Mich. "That is, on its
face, improper for a brokerage firm
to allow."
When challenged in the past over similar
stock option cases, brokerage firms
have maintained that losses incurred
by employees like Ms. Smith stemmed
from their own greed or poor judgment.
But at least one arbitration panel
has recently ruled otherwise. Earlier
this month, in a case that did not
involve WorldCom stock, arbitrators
found that a Merrill Lynch (news/quote)
employee had given questionable advice
to a client exercising his stock options.
They awarded the customer $3 million
in damages; he had asked for $3.8 million.
That may be the first of many payments
by brokerage firms, said Lawrence Klayman,
a lawyer at Klayman & Toskes in
Boca Raton, Fla. He represents 20 WorldCom
claimants against Salomon whose losses
total $20 million. "I believe
the industry will probably pay out
$20 billion in the next five years
in option cases," he said.
Though many employees of technology
companies lost money when the stock
bubble burst in 2000, WorldCom employees
appear to have been hit especially
hard. In part, that is because many
had to act fast. In September 1998,
WorldCom merged with MCI, and many
employees lost their jobs in layoffs
meant to cut costs at the combined
companies. Like most options plans,
the WorldCom program gave departing
employees up to one year to exercise
their stock options before they expired.
Through a spokesman, WorldCom declined
to comment on the complaints filed
by its workers. But the company hired
Salomon in 1997 to administer the plan
exclusively, so any worker exercising
WorldCom options had to go to Salomon.
Although such an arrangement is not
unusual, it was not the way the stock
option plan had been run at MCI. There,
former employees said, they could choose
one of three brokerage firms to deal
with stock option exercises.
Not only were the WorldCom workers
captive to Salomon as a firm, but when
they called the telephone number provided
by WorldCom they were transferred to
a group of brokers in just one office:
the branch at 3455 Peachtree Road in
the exclusive Buckhead section of Atlanta.
The head of the WorldCom stock option
plan for Salomon was Philip L. Spartis,
49, a broker who joined the firm in
1984. Mr. Spartis, who had landed the
account for Salomon in 1997, was helped
in handling it by two more brokers,
William David Hobby, 35, and Amy Jean
Elias, 36, a former insurance agent.
Securities industry records show that
Mr. Spartis and Ms. Elias were terminated
by Salomon on March 1 for abandoning
their jobs. Their lawyer did not return
repeated calls for comment. They, too,
have gone to court, filing suit against
Salomon and Jack B. Grubman, the firm's
prominent telecommunications analyst.
In it, they contend that Mr. Grubman's
continual bullishness on WorldCom stock
led them to recommend that their clients
hold on as the shares fell. In essence,
they contend that they were victims
of their own firm's research.
Though the contract with WorldCom banned
Salomon brokers from soliciting business
from WorldCom employees, that did not
stop some brokers, according to an
employee who has sued Salomon but who
declined to be identified. He said
Salomon had called him and pushed him
to cash in his options. The brokers
in the Atlanta office knew how many
options he had, he recalled, and badgered
him to exercise them, hold onto the
stock and borrow to pay transaction
costs and taxes. By following their
advice, he lost his entire seven years'
worth of option grants, which were
valued at $700,000 when he exercised
them.
In telecom's heyday, and as WorldCom's
shares roared, the business of helping
the company's employees exercise their
options exploded. With the phones ringing
off the hook at Salomon's Atlanta office,
other brokers were brought in to deal
with WorldCom workers. According to
documents filed in one of the arbitration
cases against Salomon, the group had
grown to a dozen by 2000 and had opened
2,000 accounts for WorldCom employees.
Other WorldCom claimants and their
lawyers all recount identical experiences.
The brokers who picked up the phone
in the Atlanta office always recommended
that customers exercise as many options
as they could so as to have a low cost
basis on their shares, minimizing taxes.
Because WorldCom stock would undoubtedly
be higher the next year, the brokers
argued, it would be most beneficial
for clients to buy the shares at their
relatively low exercise prices and
to hold on for long-term capital gains
tax treatment. Borrowing money from
Salomon to pay the taxes owed at the
time of the exercise and to pay for
the exercise itself was a good idea,
the brokers said, because margin interest
is tax-deductible.
In presentations to WorldCom clients,
the brokers showed charts and graphs
specifying the profits workers would
make if the shares rose -- just as
many brokers do. But never, these former
clients said, did the brokers explain
what would happen if the shares sank.
Nor did they discuss the risks of borrowing
on margin. Instead, the brokers called
the loans a credit line rather than
a margin account, the former customers
said.
Mr. Klayman, the Boca Raton lawyer,
said that a lot of these Salomon clients
had never had brokerage accounts before
and that they were unsophisticated
about the ways of Wall Street. "When
Salomon Smith Barney tells you to do
something, you do it," he said. "They
are a very large, prestigious brokerage
firm, after all."
To bolster their arguments to buy and
hold WorldCom shares, the brokers regularly
invoked the name of Mr. Grubman, the
powerful telecom analyst at Salomon
who was perpetually bullish on WorldCom,
a telecommunications colossus.
Terri Howell, a former spokeswoman
for WorldCom who left the company in
1998 to take care of her ailing mother,
exercised her options in February 1999
at $79, when Mr. Grubman was saying
that the stock was destined for $130
a share. The following August, when
the stock dipped below Ms. Howell's
exercise price, she called her broker
in Atlanta expressing concern. "He
sent me a report from Jack Grubman
saying that they would be backing up
the truck buying with both hands," Ms.
Howell said. "So I held on."
Besides dropping Mr. Grubman's name,
Mr. Spartis, according to several clients,
would often refer to discussions he
had had with Scott D. Sullivan, the
chief financial officer of WorldCom,
as a friend and client. These references
often came, the former customers said,
when WorldCom stock was falling and
Mr. Spartis was trying to persuade
customers to hold onto it.
It is common for a brokerage firm that
provides investment banking services
to a company to try to win other business
as well, like its stock option administration,
and Salomon was WorldCom's investment
banker. Personal relationships between
corporate officials and a particular
broker are also helpful in deciding
which firm gets a company's option
plan, said Bruce Brumberg, co-founder
of the Web site myStockOptions.com. "It's
very personal," he said. "A
lot of C.E.O.'s and C.F.O.'s in certain
companies may show favoritism to a
brokerage firm they deal with."
It is not clear how Mr. Spartis won
the WorldCom account, though the company
had had dealings with the Atlanta branch
before it was designated to handle
the company's option program. Mr. Spartis
and Mr. Sullivan may have become acquainted
in the early 1990's, when Mr. Sullivan
was treasurer of Advanced Telecommunications,
which had offices in the same building
in Atlanta where Mr. Spartis worked
for Salomon Smith Barney.
The WorldCom spokesman said Mr. Sullivan
was not involved in the decision to
tap Salomon for the company's option
program.
Salomon is one of the largest firms
in the business of managing stock option
plans. But a document filed in one
of the WorldCom arbitration cases against
it asserts that the Atlanta brokers "were
untrained for the intricacies of employee
stock option exercise and management
of investments of high net worth individuals
with concentrated positions."
Instead of providing personalized advice,
the filing said, the brokers developed
what was essentially a script that
was used to open and maintain as many
accounts as they could. The sales pitch
involved the exercise-and-hold recommendation
without any use of hedging strategies
to protect the clients' portfolios
in case WorldCom stock declined. And
in almost all cases, the brokers advised
clients to use a credit line to pay
for the transactions and the taxes
associated with them.
The arbitration document also argues
that Mr. Spartis operated virtually
without supervision from the branch
manager, Michael J. Grace. Whenever
Mr. Grace tried to supervise the brokers,
it says, Mr. Spartis threatened to
take his unit to another Salomon branch.
While many WorldCom workers wound up
losing everything in their dealings
with Salomon, employees of Salomon
made a lot of money. They received
fees based on the assets under management
and on margin loans.
Mr. Spartis, as head of the group,
probably reaped the most from the WorldCom
business. And he lived well. According
to real estate records, in late 1998
he bought a 13-room, colonial-style
home in Atlanta for $752,000. He also
owns a 23-foot Sea Ray motorboat.
As branch manager, Mr. Grace shared
in the money Mr. Spartis's group was
generating. In 1999, he sold a house
for $515,000 and moved into a $1.1
million house with five bedrooms, six
fireplaces, a three-car garage and
a pool, according to real estate records.
Mr. Grace forwarded a call seeking
comment to Salomon headquarters in
New York City.
WorldCom also benefited from its employees'
option exercises. In 1999, the company
received $886 million from workers
exercising their options, half of WorldCom's
free cash flow that year. In the same
year, the company received a tax deduction
of $820 million. Because their employees
must pay the taxes owed on their stock
option exercises, companies issuing
the shares receive a tax deduction
in the amount of tax that their employees
have paid.
With suits from both former employees
and clients, Salomon is battling the
WorldCom situation on two fronts. So
far, 25 clients have filed complaints
against Mr. Spartis. Salomon has paid
$875,000 to settle three of them. Twenty
are pending, and since settlements
can be confidential the status of the
two others is unclear. Another broker,
Mr. Hobby, who is still with Salomon
in Atlanta, has two additional suits
against him, and Christopher Cahillane,
a broker in a group from the Atlanta
office that left to join UBS Paine
Webber in 2000, has three suits against
him. Salomon declined to make Mr. Hobby
available for comment. And through
a UBS spokesman, Mr. Cahillane declined
to discuss his case.
Seth Lipner, a lawyer at Deutsch & Lipner
in Garden City, N.Y., who represented
the Merrill Lynch client who recently
won $3 million, also represents about
a half-dozen current or former WorldCom
employees who have sued Salomon for
losses of about $7 million. Mr. Lipner,
whose first arbitration case is scheduled
to be heard in May, said Salomon was
going to extraordinary lengths to prevent
the public from knowing what went on
in the Atlanta office.
"Salomon Smith Barney has been
ordered to produce documents, but they
have asked the arbitrators to order
that all documents produced by them
in any given case be confidential and
used only with respect to that individual
case," he said. "That is
extraordinary."
Harry S. Miller, a lawyer at Perkins,
Smith & Cohen in Boston who represents
20 former Salomon clients who lost
$20 million, said Salomon was blocking
his requests for documents that are
commonly produced in such cases. "They
are required by securities regulations
to establish and maintain a supervisory
system for purpose of protecting public
investors," he said. "But
they don't want to disclose that information
and have it fall into the public hands.
It is a very unusual objection."
A spokeswoman for Salomon said the
request for confidentiality was often
made by its lawyers.
Some former clients who lost life savings
and college education funds for their
children because of the Atlanta brokers
feel betrayed by Salomon. They expected
more from a well-known brokerage firm.
But Mr. Klayman said: "Whether
you're doing business at a major firm
or at a bucket shop, the mentality
is the same. Write the tickets, generate
the commissions, and we'll worry about
it later."
Now, WorldCom is reconsidering its
employment of Salomon as the company's
option administrator. Its stock closed
last week at $6.74.
|